Immune Checkpoint Drug Discovery In Vitro Assays
Background of Immune Checkpoint
Immune checkpoints regulate the immune system by blocking cell self-attack. Inhibitory checkpoints are targets for cancer antibody-based immunotherapies. Inhibitors of the immune checkpoints are developed to block immune checkpoints, kill cancer cells, and maintain immune homeostasis.
Distributions and Functions of Immune Checkpoint
Immune checkpoints are a normal component of immune cells, which play a crucial role in the regulation of immune tolerance and preventing self-immune attacks. Immune checkpoints bind to partner proteins, preventing the overreaction of T cell immune responses to foreign proteins. However, when immune checkpoints react to cancer cells, they prevent the immune system from destroying tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed as immune therapeutics for cancers, interdicting the combination of immune checkpoints and partner proteins, and thus T cells could kill tumor cells.
Fig.1 Interferon signaling in adaptive programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 expression. (Kalbasi, 2020)
Subtypes and Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint
It has been demonstrated that immune checkpoints as antibody-based therapy targets could regulate the immune responses to autoimmune diseases, cancer cells, and other diseases. CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 are the three main target molecules of the therapeutic studies.
Immune Checkpoint | Gene | Mechanism | Inhibitors |
CTLA-4 | CTLA4 |
|
|
PD-1 | PDCD1 |
|
|
CD22 | CD22 |
|
|
CD28 | CD28 |
|
|
CD33 | CD33 |
|
|
CD40 | CD40 |
|
|
Published Data
Paper Title | Comprehensive in vitro characterization of PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors |
Journal | Scientific reports |
Published | 2019 |
Abstract | A powerful strategy in cancer immunotherapy is the inhibition of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interaction. Developing potent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has emerged to be an efficient treatment strategy for cancer. The study aimed to guide the development of next-generation compounds that inhibit PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Therefore, they evaluated and understood the structure-activity-cytotoxicity relationships of these first-generation PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors via rigorous and systematic in vitro profiling of multiple compounds, including a macrocyclic peptide inhibitor (BMSpep-57), a peptidomimetic inhibitor (Aurigene-1), and non-peptidic small-molecule inhibitors (BMS-103, BMS-142). |
Result |
They performed biochemical assays. The results demonstrated that BMS-103 and BMS-142 were strongly active. Acute cytotoxicity of both compounds greatly compromised the immunological activity, while Aurigene-1 did not show any activity in either biochemical or immunological assays. In addition, they also reported the discovery of a small-molecule immune modulator, which exhibited favorable drug-like properties and strong immunological activity. The results of the study results may play an important role in guiding the development of next-generation PD-1/PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors.
Fig.2 Ability of compounds to inhibit PD-1/PD-L1 binding in an ELISA competition assay. (Ganesan, 2019) |
References
- Kalbasi, A.; Ribas, A. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020, 20(1): 25-39.
- Ganesan, A.; et al. Comprehensive in vitro characterization of PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors. Scientific reports. 2019, 9(1): 1-19.